logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.07.31 2014고정87
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in general civil engineering works and construction waste collection business under the mutual name of “D” in the Government City C.

On September 2012, the Defendant cut the existing camping field on the above land at the construction site site construction site of F, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., which was located in Dongbcheon-do, and buried approximately KRW 75t of waste lumbers generated by cutting down trees that were born on the above land without permission at the construction site at the above site.

Accordingly, the Defendant buried industrial wastes on the land that is not a waste disposal facility permitted, approved, or reported.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Partial statement of each police suspect interrogation protocol (including substitute part) against the defendant;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigate and report on site photographs, investigation reports (refluent sampling of wastes), sampling photographs at the time of collecting samples, official notices of illegal reclamation of wastes, relevant data, and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Articles 63 and 8 (2) of the former Wastes Control Act (amended by Act No. 11914, Jul. 16, 2013);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant alleged that he did not participate in the instant waste reclamation and denied the facts constituting the crime.

However, the Defendant, at the police level, stated that the instant wastes were buried in line with the Defendant’s first investigation and were buried in accordance with the direction of G/H (around 133 pages of the investigation record), and that the Defendant was consistently stated that the Defendant buried the instant wastes in line with the direction of H/G (around 163-1 pages of the investigation record), and that the instant wastes were buried in line with the direction of H/G (around 163-1 pages of the investigation record).

G also is why the police makes it difficult to ask waste timber to the ground.

arrow