logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.10.29 2015고정1044
건설폐기물의재활용촉진에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who actually runs a corporation B, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of civil engineering, building, etc.

No person shall reclaim wastes in any place other than the waste disposal facilities permitted, approved, or reported pursuant to the Wastes Control Act.

1. Defendant A, while carrying out the construction of new multi-household C from July 2010 to March 201, Defendant A buried industrial wastes, such as waste concrete and waste paper, generated from the construction site at the construction site at the construction site at the end of February 2011, at the entrance of an underground parking lot, not waste disposal facilities permitted, approved, or reported pursuant to the Wastes Control Act, but at the end of February 201.

2. Defendant B, in relation to his business, committed the same offense as that of the representative director, Defendant A, acting on behalf of the representative director.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing defect repair works site photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 63 and 8(2) of the former Wastes Control Act (Amended by Act No. 11914, Jul. 16, 2013);

B. Defendant B: Articles 67, 63, and 8(2) of the former Wastes Control Act (Amended by Act No. 11914, Jul. 16, 2013);

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the Defendants voluntarily surrenders the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that the buried wastes were restored to the original state, the Defendant A did not have any criminal record, and the fact that the waste weight was modified as a violation of the Wastes Control Act under the premise that the waste weight is not less than five tons.

arrow