beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the argument that the plaintiff and the defendant supplement or emphasize in the trial, and as to the argument that the plaintiff and the defendant supplement or emphasize in the trial, all of them are the same as the entry in the judgment of the first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. Additional determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion regarding the part of the claim for medical expenses in the future asserts that the plaintiff suffered injury, such as degradation of recognition function due to the instant accident, and that at least KRW 5,00,000 for future medical expenses are required for the future.
According to the records of Gap evidence No. 13, the results of the physical appraisal commission to the head of the first instance court, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff may suffer from injury to the knowledge function and the part of the medical treatment, which may require continuous pharmacologic treatment. The plaintiff, in the course of receiving outpatient treatment from G Hospital on January 25, 2019, claimed symptoms such as "the plaintiff raised symptoms such as "It is true that he is suffering from memory after wound in the skiing ground before 2 years prior to the second year prior to the second year prior to the second year prior to the second year prior to the second year prior to the death, he was suffering from symptoms one week, and there is a large number of times at the house," but until the first instance court was in the first instance court, the plaintiff did not have any other reason to determine whether the plaintiff was suffering from injury to the function and condition of treatment, and thus, the plaintiff did not have any other reason to determine whether the above symptoms appear in light of the function and condition of treatment."
B. The defendant's claim on the limitation of liability is examined.