1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance repeats his assertion to the same effect as the judgment of the court of first instance, even in the appellate trial.

However, in this case, the reason why this court will clarify is the content of the judgment of the first instance.

Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

However, part of the judgment of the first instance is revised as follows.

2. Matters to be modified: ① The Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to Which the State Is a Party is a Party (amended by Presidential Decree No. 27475, Sept. 2, 2016) shall be construed as “former Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party” (amended by Presidential Decree No. 27475, Sept. 2, 2016), and the “Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party” as “former Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party (amended by Act No. 14038, Mar. 2, 2016)” as “Article 10-1096424 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to which the State is a Party” (amended by Presidential Decree No. 10-105789, Oct. 2, 2016) and Article 12 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party” shall be construed as “The State is obliged to restrict the State’s participation in bidding for a more than 10-106.