(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.10.11 2017구단305

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.10.11 2017구단305

자동차운전면허취소처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. At around 20:30 on December 16, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) driven a No. B NAS car and driven a two-lane road of the front speed of the front speed of the front speed of the front speed of the front speed of the front speed of the front speed of the front speed of the front speed of the said No.S. car; (b) caused a traffic accident that shocks into the left side of the said No.S. car driving in the same direction as the front right side of the said No.S. car in the front speed of the front speed of the said No.S. car (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”); and (c) caused the victim to suffer an injury, such as the catum catum and tension, which require treatment for about two weeks; and (d) caused the said low-speed car to be repaired by the front speed of the front speed of the vehicle to be repaired by 101,100 won and 370% of the repair cost of the said vehicle.

However, the plaintiff is waiting to proceed immediately after the traffic accident of this case, but the plaintiff moved the vehicle to stop the defect, divided into the victim's talk, and did not inform the victim of the defect's personal details or contact details.

B. On January 10, 2017, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke the driver’s license (Class II ordinary) against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff was injured by the instant traffic accident and did not perform necessary measures or obligation to report under Article 54(1) or (2) of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but was dismissed on March 21, 2017.

On March 4, 1995, the Plaintiff has a record of causing a physical damage accident in violation of signal or instruction, and there are many traffic offenses including violating signal or instruction on October 15, 2015.

E. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff caused the instant traffic accident by occupational negligence, thereby causing injury to the victim, and providing relief to the victim.

참조조문

-도로교통법 제54조 제1항

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2018.02.21 2017구단824

-춘천지방법원 2017.1.12. 선고 2015노1279 판결

-수원지방법원 2018.12.19 2018구단4254

-수원지방법원 2015.10.22 2015가단105106

-인천지방법원 2020.12.14 2020고단9112