The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 12:00 on November 17, 201, the Defendant demanded the victim D (manam and 44 years of age) to make a draft and make a written pledge in accordance with the same. However, the victim was able to take up and report the draft of the said pledge with himself/herself. Thus, in order to avoid this request, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the right shouldered 14 days on the victim by putting the victim’s right shoulder, which was sentling the draft of the said pledge, while putting him/her down his/her upper right shoulder and shake it down on the upper right.

2. The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in the judgment is admissible. However, the following circumstances revealed in the trial process: (i) the victim made a ambiguous statement as to whether he/she was subject to the complaint at the time of the instant case after being investigated in his/her status as a suspect in the relevant case on November 13, 201; (ii) considering these circumstances, rather than the victim's statement that he/she first proposed to withdraw the complaint, the victim's demand for withdrawal of the complaint is persuasive; (iii) the contents of the draft written oath are not disadvantageous to the victim because it is not unfavorable to the victim; and (iv) considering the victim's physical strength, it seems difficult for the defendant to keep him/her away from his/her hand; and (v) even if the victim continued to have been treated as a witness of the part before this case, he/she has been issued a written diagnosis from another member of the National Assembly on the day he/she was issued, and (v) the defendant has to sell the written diagnosis to the victim and another member of the instant case.