beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 29, 2012, the Defendant lent a chips equivalent to KRW 390,99,000 from D, a roller operator, to the said casino, and carried out the so-called chip gambling in the said casino with a chip amounting to KRW 399,99,000,000,000 from the said casino, along with the chip customers. “After having two copies of the card, a chip is placed on a chip on a chip and on a chip, and the sum of two card numbers on a chip is close to 9.”
2. On April 29, 2012, the Defendant lent a chips equivalent to KRW 20 million from D, who is a rolling business operator, to the said casino, in which the Defendant used the said casino as a so-called chip gambling in which the Defendant chips amounting to KRW 20 million from the said casino, along with the franchising customers. The Defendant used the said casino as follows: “Grabbing a chip to the bank, chip, and the sum of the two copies of the card to the franchis and the customers by dividing the card into two parts, and then chiping to the franchis and the number of the two copies of the card is close to KRW 9.”
3. On July 10, 2012, the Defendant lent a chips equivalent to KRW 30 million from D, who is a rolling business operator, to the said casino, at the said casino, and carried out the so-called chip gambling by a person who chips on a chip and chip on a chip and chip on a chip on a chip and on a chip in two separate pages, and in which the sum of the two numbers of card numbers on a chip on a chip is close to 9.”
Accordingly, the defendant habitually stuffed the defendant.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the accused, D, and E by the prosecution;
1. Statement by each prosecutor's office with respect to F;
1. Details of entry or departure;
1. Habitualness of the holding: Application of the damp-style Acts and subordinate statutes in light of the frequency of gambling in the holding, the amount of gambling, and the fact that each gambling and gambling has been repeated three times in a foreign casino;
1. Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act comprehensively including relevant provisions concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;
1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: