1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Details of the disposition

On March 1, 1995, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as an assistant professor with C University Food Engineering, which was established and operated by the Intervenor, and served until he was promoted to the associate professor on October 1, 1999, and was promoted to the professor on October 1, 2005 and then dismissed.

C University food engineering and D, a student, from July 2015 to the Plaintiff’s laboratory, retired from office on May 2016, and reported the Plaintiff’s sexual harassment case to C University sexual harassment and sexual assault counseling centers (hereinafter “sexual harassment counseling center”) on November 24, 2016.

On December 6, 2016 (1) and December 8, 2016 (2) a sexual harassment counseling center held a research committee to investigate the said case, and the said case was deliberated upon by the teachers’ personnel committee on December 21, 2016, and on January 16, 2017, the president of the Cuniversity requested the Intervenor to make a resolution on disciplinary action against the Plaintiff.

On January 26, 2017, the intervenor requested the teachers' disciplinary committee to make a resolution on disciplinary action against the plaintiff.

On February 15, 2017 (1), February 24, 2017 (2), March 20, 2017 (3j), and March 30, 2017 (4j), the teachers’ disciplinary committee deliberated on the above cases, and decided to dismiss the Plaintiff.

On March 30, 2017, an intervenor dismissed the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”). The main contents of the grounds for the disciplinary action are as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disciplinary cause”). 1. The Plaintiff committed sexual harassment against D as follows.

① During the latest one year period, the Plaintiff sent a word, contact or letter, and as a result, D had a mental stressed. When doing so, D expressed that “I am bad” or “I see so much of contact”, the Plaintiff made an answer to “I am bad” and “I see why I am you would see. I am. I am. I am. I see why I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am..

(2) The Plaintiff is also in the spring semester of 2016.