The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 27, 2017, at around 17:34, the Defendant released the victim’s cell phone number of the information and communications network victim’s cell phone number from around 101 to June 29, 2017, and damaged the victim’s reputation by disclosing the victim’s cell phone number to “E (victim’s cell phone number)” in the name of “AUM car page Da”, posted on the D’s bulletin board, i.e., “C., e., e., e., e., e., e., f., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., f., 101-dong apartment 101-dong 1002 at the Defendant’s residence, and disclosing the victim’s cell phone number from around 204 times to June 29, 2017.

2. The determination is that it falls under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will explicitly manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act. According to the written agreement submitted to the court on November 21, 2017, which was the date of the instant indictment, it can be recognized that the victim does not want punishment against the defendant. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and it is so decided as per Disposition.