logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.05.21 2015고정834
보조금관리에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 400,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a senior citizen who is a senior citizen in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Apartment-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On September 8, 2010, the Defendant filed a false application for a subsidy of KRW 2,300,000,000 by means of false application for a total of 23 times, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes, as if the senior citizens in the above apartment complex were to engage in volunteer activities, even though they did not have engaged in volunteer activities in the previous apartment complex, as if they were to engage in volunteer activities with photographs attached to volunteer activities taken before. The Defendant received a false subsidy of KRW 100,000 from the senior citizens of Gyeonggi-do, a metropolitan organization on September 13, 2010.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application for community service activities expenses and payment status of senior citizen centers;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 40 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts and the Management of Alternative Subsidies for Punishment, and Selection of Fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order does not specify the frequency and duration of the crime, and it does not correspond to the nature of the crime in light of the transparency of the national subsidy system, but the punishment as ordered by the summary order shall be partially reduced by taking into account the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and against himself, the primary crime, the fact that the defendant lives as a recipient of basic pension at the age of the aged, the fact that the subsidy received illegally is not used individually.

arrow