logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.04.12 2018고단125
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 25, 2017, the Defendant: 01:25 around 01:25, 200 the Gangdong-gu Seoul Olympic Winter Games, 70-gil 61.

피스 텔 1 층 화장실 앞에서, ‘ 남자가 바지를 벗고 있다’ 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 강동 경찰서 B 지구대 소속 경위 C이 피고 인의 흘러내린 바지를 입혀 주려고 하자 술에 취하여 아무런 이유 없이 “ 나 건드리지 마 개새끼야, 씨 발 놈 아 내가 누 군지 알아 ”라고 욕을 하면서 손으로 위 C의 멱살을 잡고, 위 C을 향해 주먹을 휘두르는 한편, 발로 위 C의 정강이 부분을 여러 차례 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written statements D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the nature of the instant crime committed by a police officer in the course of performing official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of the instant crime is not weak, but the degree of the assault is not severe, its mistake is recognized and the attitude of reflecting it seems that the perpetrator made a deposit of money for the victimized police officer, and there is no past record of criminal punishment, etc., the punishment as set forth in the Disposition shall be determined by taking into account the factors for sentencing such as the fact that the perpetrator committed the instant crime.

arrow