1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, Defendant Bohn Co., Ltd. in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid:

1. The reasons for this court’s explanation are as follows: “C, F, D, G, and 3,200 square meters” in the 6th judgment of the first instance court, “3,599 square meters”; “3,599 square meters” in the 6th judgment of the first instance court; “Before the filing of the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff provided all necessary documents for the registration of ownership transfer of E and H land to Defendant Lindo.” The Plaintiff notified Defendant Lindo that he had prepared all documents necessary for the registration of ownership transfer of each of the instant land by the delivery of the instant complaint to Defendant E and H, and prepared for the performance of the obligation to pay the purchase price of each of the instant land to Defendant E and H, and prepared for the performance of the obligation to pay the purchase price of each of the instant land to “C, D, E, G,” “7,2, and3 square meters” in the 6th judgment of the first instance court; and the Plaintiff provided each of the instant land to “the 9th registration of ownership transfer” in each of each of the instant land.

paragraphs (c) and (c)

In addition to the addition of the entry in the following 3. paragraphs between the 10th to 12th 7th 2th 2th 3th 2th 3th 13 and the entry in the reasoning of the judgment in the first instance and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, this shall be cited as it is, in accordance with the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff’s claim for the difference in compensation for each of the lands E and G 1) of the part to be dried [Article 2-2(b) and (c) of the judgment of the court of first instance (Articles 2-2(b) and 10(3) of the judgment of the court of first instance (Articles 10-3 and 12-7 of the judgment)] (b) of the Plaintiff’s claim for the difference in compensation for each of the lands E and G 1 of the Plaintiff’s claim on August 21, 2013, the Plaintiff’s claim was concluded on August 21, 2013 to purchase the land C, D, and E with the purchase price of KRW 2.