1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff operated the Hanwon-si Private Teaching Institute under the mutual name “G” in the building located in the Youngdong-gu F, Suwon-si, and the Defendants worked for the Plaintiff as an instructor at the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute.

B. Thereafter, on April 18, 2014, Defendant B, C, and D told the Plaintiff to retire from the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute, and thereafter, the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute is discontinued at that time, and on June 17, 2014, Defendant B, C, and D established and operated jointly with the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute (hereinafter “Defendant’s private teaching institute”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Defendants asserted that they jointly establish the Defendants’ private teaching institute, and thereafter induce the students of the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on March 2014, in order to attract them to take part in the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute. ① Defendant B had been employed falsely in the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute and acquired school materials and contact numbers. ② Defendant C provided personal lessons to Plaintiff C around May 2014, who worked for the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute, and ③ Defendant D refused to take part in the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute on the ground that it does not prevent any case while working for the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute. ④ Defendant E interfered with the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute’s operation by: (a) Defendant E did an inappropriate act with the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute students and by spreading false facts to the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute.

In addition, the Defendants, around May 2014, damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by pointing out false facts, such as “the Plaintiff is a person who is in a high place and in a dual place, and all Plaintiff’s instructors including the Defendants will have a private teaching institute only.”

Accordingly, 10,00 won of monthly tuition fees = 450,000 won of monthly tuition fees x 10 months x 10 months of the above 10 students, as the students of the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute moved to the Defendants’ private teaching institute.