1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, in addition to the third to the third to the third to the seventh to the third to the third to the third to the third to the third to the following, the reasoning of the first to the court's judgment is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case shall be cited as it is in accordance with

① At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserted to the effect that the Defendant’s vehicle was parked in the zone subject to the prohibition of parking and stopping, as well as that the parking caused interference with other traffic, thereby violating the traffic laws and regulations. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the images of the evidence Nos. 7 through 9 submitted by the Plaintiff alone, which alone led to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage to the Defendant’s vehicle, were parked at a place within 10 meters from the crosswalk or bus stop, or obstructed the traffic of the vehicle going straight down from the narrow side on the crosssection due to the alcohol lane, and there is no other evidence to recognize otherwise. Furthermore, even if the Defendant’s vehicle was parked in violation of the traffic laws and regulations, the instant accident was caused by the error of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was illegally parked in violation of the signal, and thus, it is difficult to deem that the Defendant’s vehicle stopping affected the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.