1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the last to the last to the 15th to the last to the 11th to the 15th to the 5th to the above second to the 5th to the court's ruling; the second to the second to the 14th to the second to the 6th to the 11th to the 14th to the 6th to the 6th to the 6th to the 2th to the 7th to the 7th to the 10th to the 11th to the 2th to the 11th to the 7th to the 2th to the 2th to the 11th to the 11th to the 7th to the 2th to the 2th to the 11th to the 7th to the 11th to the 2th to the 11th,

2. The part (1) used or added by the Plaintiff’s inner part is likely to be able to recognize the loss of labor ability due to drilling, only when the trend is so considerably likely to affect future employment, job selection, promotion, possibility of changing occupation, etc. in relation to the parts of the trend, the victim’s gender, age, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da105062, Jan. 13, 201). As such, the Plaintiff’s inner part part is located near the left part and it appears possible to cover a certain degree of trace by cremation, etc., and the Plaintiff’s inner part is likely to be able to live in a workplace with his inner part, complete part, hand, hand, son, and son’s inner part, and the victim’s sex, age, etc., and it appears that it appears that it would be unreasonable to acknowledge that the Plaintiff’s physical condition might not have any other effect after the implementation of the Plaintiff’s examination of evidence No. 27.