1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, as follows. As such, the reasoning of the judgment is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part to be used is as it is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the same Act. Of the “1. Facts recognized” of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part to be used is as follows: “Installation of a fence with about 5 meters in length on the site connecting each point of about 1.2, 20, 21, 21, 22, and 1.4 meters in height on the site connecting each point of 2, 20, 21, and 22, and 1.2 meters in height on the site connected each point of 1.2 meters in height, 20, 21, 222, 23 meters in height on the site connected each point.”

2. argument and judgment of the first instance court;

B. On May 10, 1994, Defendant C’s assertion and the gist of the grounds for appeal were as follows: (a) Defendant C’s assertion and summary of the grounds for appeal were aware that the instant FF land and its ground buildings were included in 22m2 in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun on May 10, 1994; and (b) Defendant C also purchased the said F F land and its ground buildings from G on July 12, 2005 and continuously occupied the said FF land and its ground buildings for 20 years; (c) Defendant C’s acquisition by prescription on May 10, 2014 with respect to the instant part on the ground of appeal, as the grounds for appeal, Defendant C’s wall (No. 8-2) on the site connected in order to each point of 21,22, and 23m20m27m27m2, which were connected to the instant part on the ground, and the existence of cement fence existed in the order of 200m21.