Text
1. The Defendant, in turn, connects the Plaintiff with each point indicated in the separate sheet No. 15 to 22, and 15 on the ground of the Plaintiff, Incheon City.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an owner of the area of 780 square meters prior to Dacheon-si.
B. The Defendant is the owner of (D) part (a) of the ship connecting each point in sequence 15 to 22, and 15 of the annexed drawings on the ground of Incheon-si, the Defendant connects each point in sequence of (a) part (a) of cement block structure, 13 square meters of cement block structure, fluor tobacco drying structure, and 23 through 26, and 23 of the annexed drawings, and (b) part (c) of the ship connecting each point in sequence of (a) part (a) of the pipe pipe structure, roof toilet, 3 square meters of the annexed drawings, 27 through 30, 25, 24, and 27 of the annexed drawings, and 31 square meters of cement block structure, 9, 10, 36 through 40, and 31 square meters of the annexed drawings.
[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number with several numbers), the result of this court's entrustment of appraisal to the National Land Information Corporation No. 1 of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of claim, the Defendant is obligated to remove the part (B) of the cement block structure, pipe structure, asbestos slate roof, and 3 square meters of the attached Form No. 27 through 30, 25, 24, and 27 of the attached Form No. 15 through 22, and 15 of the attached Form No. 15, in order to the Plaintiff, each point in (a) part of the cement block structure, flat block structure, tobacco roof building, and 13 square meters of the attached Form No. 23 through 26, and 23 of the attached Form No. 23, and the part (c) part (a) of the cement block structure, pipe structure, and 31 square meters of the attached Form No. 31 through 33,9, 10, 36 through 40, and 31 of the attached Form No. 1, and the part (a) of the cement roof and the part (b) of the cement roof connected to the Plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.