Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the publisher and representative director of online newspaper C.

On March 17, 2015, at around 10:00, the Defendant had access to the C Internet homepage using a computer at the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Office D and C office, and it appears that the Defendant “Habitual Employment” was revealed that the E mayor was employed as a secretary and an executive officer at the time when he/she was employed as a member of the National Assembly and Minister, and the E mayor was in the F market.

In particular, if it is confirmed that there are three persons, including her South and her half, without being limited to one person, who is not a relative of the E market-friendly relatives, it is likely that the moral controversy will spread.

At the time of the 18th and 19th National Assembly members of the 19th National Assembly, the Gag Go (40) was employed as Grade 6 of May 1, 2010 and had class 5 serve as Grade 5 secretary by May 15, 2014.

E The Mayor has worked as a 6th class visa around the 2019th 19th 19th Do of Chok GC's birth (36) and has served as a scambrue with the 6th scambrue, and has served as a scambrue.

The E market elected to the F market in June of the past year, along with his/her inauguration, appointed Chok G as a market secretary (class V extraordinary civil service).

The E market was also reported to the effect that the victim G and the victim I suffered preferential treatment in the E market by posting an article stating that she was appointed as the head of the H Foundation Strategic Support Team of the H Foundation that he/she was the president on August 22 of the past two months after his/her market appointment was known.

However, the victims did not have a relationship with the E market and did not have a relationship with the E market.

Nevertheless, the defendant has harmed the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts through the information and communications network for the purpose of slandering as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to I and G;

1. Each family relation certificate, such as a copy of article output, article output, etc.;