1. All appeals against the principal claim and counterclaim of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall be dismissed.

1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is as follows: "No. 2, No. 3, No. 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance," and "No. 2, No. 3, No. 13, No. 2, No. 4, No. 15 of the judgment (hereinafter "No. 1, No. 3, No. 4, No. 10, No. 2, No. 3, No. 14 of the judgment, No. 2 of the court of first instance, No. 3, No. 4 of the judgment, No. 2 of the court of first instance, No. 4 of the judgment, No. 10, No. 15 of the judgment, No. 2 of the court of second instance, No. 3 of the judgment, No. 10, No. 4 of the judgment, and No. 2 of the court of second instance, No. 4 of the judgment," and "No. 27, No. 2013 of the judgment "No. 6,"

2. Determination as to the primary claim among the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim claim by Defendant C Service Management Body

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff asserts to the following purport: (a) the Defendants are not legitimate management body or manager of the instant building; (b) Defendant CB management body was established without due process; and (c) there was no legitimate general assembly resolution at the time of business registration on March 22, 2012.

November 29, 2012 satisfies the procedural substantive requirements, such as convening procedures and quorums.