The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The Defendant is a person who was discharged from office in March 2017 while serving as a director of (State)B.

On December 28, 2017, the Defendant, under the title “D” on the Internet CW bulletin board, published a letter to the effect that, for the purpose of slandering at least on December 28, 2017, the board of directors of Seoul (D.) was able to operate the board of directors at all at all, and was unable to prohibit the opening of the board of directors at all, as he had operated the board of directors at all, without operating the board of directors at all, and was operating the board of directors at all. (b) The proposal was also made by the hot boiler, which is capable of saving the annual gas cost of KRW 50 million, and the issue was pointed out, and the purchase of the State-owned land was also pointed out. However, the return to the meeting was a heavy disciplinary measure of 26:8 months of the director dismissal and the business trip suspension. (b)

However, the hot boiler problem was presented to the board of directors as the issue issue agenda of the defendant, but its inefficiency was confirmed and rejected. The issue of idle site was also presented to the board of directors' meeting. Although the defendant asserted the possibility of development, it was confirmed as a development-restricted area and a forest class 2, and it was possible to develop it. In the case of the purchase of state-owned land, it was confirmed that it was possible for the defendant to gratuitously own the land, but the defendant asserted the possibility of gratuitous reversion to the lawyer, but it was confirmed that it was impossible to gratuitously revert to the lawyer. The defendant was punished in accordance with the legitimate disciplinary decision of the Ethics Committee by making improper acts, such as disclosing the accusation to the media immediately after the defendant filed a complaint against B, the representative of the corporation B, based on the fact that the defendant had not been confirmed. However, despite the defendant's legitimate assertion, the board of directors did not look at the issue, such as the hot water boiler, the idle site, and the purchase of state-owned land.