logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2017.12.20 2016가합1153
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff under a real estate lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant with respect to Pyeongtaek-si C and 302 Dong-dong.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff indicated the claim that granted D the right of representation to enter into a monthly rent lease agreement, not a lease agreement on a deposit basis.

However, D entered into a lease contract on behalf of the plaintiff with the defendant with a deposit amounting to 35 million won for the real estate stated in Paragraph 1 of the order.

Since the above lease contract was concluded by a non-exclusive agent, it is not effective for the plaintiff. Thus, there is no obligation to return the deposit amount of KRW 35 million under the above lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant.

2. Judgment by public notice of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow