All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The Defendants purchased and stored stolens from F in breach of the duty of care required for the operation of the pawned Art. 199.

2. The judgment of the court below is justified in light of the reasoning of the judgment below and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone that it is difficult to see that the defendants neglected their duty of care as a person engaged in pawning business. The judgment of the court below is justified in light of the records and records.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal against the Defendants is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.