Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,00 and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 16:50 on June 12, 2015, Defendant A: (a) at the “E text store operated by Defendant A” in Seosan-si; (b) at the “E text store operated by Defendant A, in F’s son G, and F, the victim, and Defendant B (the age of 35), who have been in dispute with Defendant B, Defendant A her husband and wife, carried the erobbbial bat of Defendant B with his hand, and had Defendant B her face over the floor by putting the erobbbbbbbbling sat, sating the head sat, thereby causing the injury of Defendant B, such as the cat and tension in need of medical treatment for about 21 days, by taking the hand into account the face of Defendant B.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) and for the foregoing reasons, was the victim and the Defendant A (or 53 years of age) in dispute with the victim and the Defendant A (or 53 years of age) for the said reasons, Defendant B suffered bodily injury, such as salves, salves, salves, salves, and salves of Defendant A’s head salves, and salves up to the bottom of Defendant A’s head salves, and salves up to the bottom of Defendant A’s body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the body photographs and the written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 25 of the Criminal Act, the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines

2. Defendants of detention in the workhouse: Reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act.

1. Defendant A was ordered to take a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as of January 22, 2015 on the ground that Defendant A assaulted G that was the third grade of elementary school students at the time on November 11, 2014, on the ground that F would not sell goods (see, e.g., evidence records 25 pages) to his/her father’s wife on the ground that he/she would desire Defendant A, but the F would eventually have committed an offense by denying the fact of committing the offense in the judgment of Defendant A, even though it is obvious that Defendant A committed the offense in light of H and Defendant B’s statement, etc., the crime is likely to be committed, such as denying the fact of having committed the offense in the judgment of Defendant A and criticize Defendant B who is the victim.