logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.06.25 2020고정141
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

1. The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 200,000.

2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C around 18:00 on January 2, 2019, around 17, 1019, in front of the port area of the Sobin subway Station No. 1017, in front of the port area of the Busan, Defendant A, with the hand floor of the Defendant A once, boomed with the hand floor of the Defendant A, twice the part of the Defendant A with the left hand, and boomed Defendant B’s flap with the handb.

The Defendants set up against C (51 years of age) at the same time and at the same place as above, and Defendant A took her chest part two times in the mash, and Defendant B assaulted C jointly by means of salkeing C’s dubage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statements in this Court

1. A witness C's partial statement in this Court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which investigation reports are entered;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act for the Defendants who choose to commit a crime;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B’s assertion and judgment as to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act do not contain any flobbbial fat of the victim C, and Defendant B asserted that this constitutes self-defense or legitimate act inasmuch as the said victim flobededed the victim to defend himself when she go beyond Defendant B by walking on the bridge.

However, in full view of the fact that Defendant B first her fat, in the police and this court, stated that Defendant B had her fat, and that Defendant B had her fat around her fat, and that Defendant B had her fat around her fat, and had her bat around her fat, and had her batdd with C, and had her batddd with C, but was stated that C had her fatddd immediately before Defendant B exceeded her b.

Therefore, the defendant B's above assertion that C was able to take advantage of his intention in the process of the attack of C is believed as it is.

arrow