logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.05.10 2018고정154
동물보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall inflict an injury on an animal in order to prevent direct threat to human life or body by animals, notwithstanding the existence of any other means.

On November 29, 2017, the Defendant discovered that F was liable for return to the animal, and that F returned to the animal, at around 15:52, the Defendant had the domicile of the Defendant located in Ansan-gu, Manyang-gu, Manyang-si, and that F returned to F, which was not good for his own assault on July 17, 2017, with the view to having the animal return to the animal.

The Defendant: (a) was driving away away away from the direction of the Defendant, and the Defendant continued to drive away from the direction of the Defendant; and (b) was sponsed by the Defendant at the entrance of the said E-Ba 101-dong entrance, leading to the instant E-Ba 101-dong entrance, leading to approximately three (3) weeks of the running of the sponsor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical treatment;

1. Articles 46(1) and 8(2)4 of the former Animal Protection Act (amended by Act No. 14651, Mar. 21, 2017 (amended by Act No. 14651, Mar. 22, 2018) regarding criminal facts; the selection of fines (the determination of fines on the summary order shall be made by reducing the amount of fines on the summary order in consideration of the point agreed with F and the point of reflection, etc.)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow