1. The Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime before August 17, 2016, among the crimes listed in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet of crimes.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) in the Busan District Court's branch branch, and the judgment was finalized on August 17, 2016.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1455" is a person who works as an insurance designer of the I in Busan Shipping Daegu H insurance agency.

The Defendant, acting as the clinic of “J”, and posted a photograph and public relations article on various Internet SNS, such as Blogs, Sone Star Program, and Facebook North Korea, which emphasizes re-fluences, such as high-class apartment buildings, external car cars, and scenic views, as if he were a competent financial designer capable of forming a large portion through stock investment, etc., the Defendant was willing to acquire money from the victims by fraud to the effect that “I will guarantee the principal and make a final payment for investment to the unspecified number of victims who reported the above notice.”

On July 24, 2015, the Defendant, at the above (State) I Office around July 24, 2015, received a large amount of profit through a share investment, etc. if the Defendant, who requested the victim K to report false advertisements and provide financial counseling.

It was suggested to the effect that the principal will be guaranteed even after payment of the final revenue of approximately 10% or 15% after one year.

However, at the time, the Defendant had a demand for monthly expenditure of approximately KRW 30 million for the lease of a foreign passenger car, apartment monthly rent, and the cost of living in the country, while the monthly revenue from an insurance business was only KRW 7 million. Unlike personal property or revenue sources, the Defendant was expected to use the investment funds received from the victimized party as a whole in return to the existing investors and personal living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to receive profits or to guarantee the payment of principal by investing the invested funds of the victimized party from the beginning.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceiving the victim.