1. The amount remaining after deducting the expenses for auction from the proceeds of the sale by selling the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 for auction;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. When the Plaintiff and the Defendants were dead on September 27, 1982, the Plaintiff and the Defendants were in a prison relationship, and on March 15, 1983, the Plaintiff and the Defendants completed the registration of transfer of shares in relation to the real estate listed in the [Attachment No. 1] List on September 27, 1982 (hereinafter “H real estate”) on the ground of inheritance on September 27, 1982, respectively, 6/29; Defendant B 4/29; Defendant C 1/29; Defendant D, F, and Selection E completed the registration of transfer of shares in relation to 4/29, respectively.

B. Since the mother-friendly I died on February 17, 1996, the Plaintiff and the Defendants completed the share transfer registration in 1/29 each on May 28, 2015 regarding I’s share 6/29 among H real estate due to inheritance on February 17, 1996.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

A. Although the registration of ownership transfer has been made with respect to the H real estate claimed in Defendant B and E’s main defense, it is merely a fact that the inheritance registration was made in the absence of an inheritance division agreement among co-inheritors. In order to resolve the inheritance-sharing relationship due to inheritance, this case’s main lawsuit is unlawful in violation of the Family Litigation Act since it should be subject to the procedure for division of inherited property under the Family Litigation Act in order to resolve the co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’ co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’ co-inheritors’ co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-ownership. In other words, the following circumstances are considered to have taken full account of the evidence incurred prior to the judgment and the entire purport of the pleading’s arguments’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-inheritors’s co-ownership’s evidence No.