The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a student attending the third year of the Joseon University's Art College.

On September 26, 2014, at around 21:37, the Defendant: (a) taken the stack of the D convenience store located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and (b) taken her order, and (c) discovered the ice distribution containing the clothing, etc. owned by the victim E and thought he/she had it, and (d) stolen the ice distribution, citing one 1,00,000, 33,800 won, oral 1,000 won, and 25,500 won, respectively, for women’s use in the market price owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of photographs inside and outside of the scene of theft incidents), investigation reports (Attachment of CCTV photographs), investigation reports (Attachment of CCTV photographs to a criminal suspect's crime), investigation reports (Attachment of credit card sales slips to a suspect's use), investigation reports (Attachment of door-to-door sales slips), investigation reports (Attachment of photographs of recovery of damaged articles), investigation reports (Attachment of documents, such as details of purchase of clothing A submitted by a suspect);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the selection of a fine and a fine of 300,000 won);

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s argument regarding Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 201Da20119, Apr. 1, 201) (i.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da20119, Apr. 1, 201) is based on the following: (a) the Defendant’s argument

In light of the records, the following can be seen in light of the records: (i) it is inevitable to say that at the time of the instant case, “FBL 201,” which is the address of the Defendant, was entered in the stuffed matter owned by the victim; and (ii) there is no special circumstance to see such fact.