1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) around March 2005, the defendant, together with the plaintiff, worked in the apartment cafeteria located in the Dong-dong in the Dong-dong in the Dong-gu, Dong-gu. On March 2006, the defendant requested that the plaintiff be registered in his name as a basic recipient when the defendant owns a vehicle to purchase a vehicle for commuting to and from work of the disabled, the basic recipient cannot be viewed as benefits if he owns the vehicle, and the registration is requested to change the registration in his name. On March 29, 2006, the plaintiff accepted the contract and entered into an oral title trust agreement with the plaintiff on March 29, 2006, and completed the transfer of ownership in the name of the plaintiff as to the vehicle listed in the attached list.

B. Determination is not sufficient to acknowledge the existence of a title trust agreement with the Plaintiff’s assertion solely on the basis of each evidence of the Plaintiff’s submission, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.