Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

[Defendant A, Defendant B]

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a person engaged in breast farming in Chungcheongnam-gun G, Chungcheongnam-gun, and Defendant B is a person engaged in driving service of delivering feed in the Nonghyup located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

As of May 24, 2005, the Defendants used a huge amount of compensation in the area of Chungcheongnam-gun under the Special Act on the Construction of a Multifunctional Administrative City in the Chungcheongnam-gun area for the extension of the measure to accelerate the new administrative capital and the construction of a multifunctional administrative city in the area of Chungcheongnam-gun. As of May 24, 2005, the Defendants used one livestock shed owned by the Defendant A, divided into two livestock penss. The Defendant A’s mother received double livestock farming compensation as if they were engaged in each livestock industry in the name of the Defendant A and the name of the Defendant B, and considered

On December 12, 2006, the Defendants prepared and submitted a written agreement on compensation for obstacles (business) as if Defendant B had engaged in each livestock industry using breast 27 miles in the said land using the 27-marith in a prospective area for the construction project of the Multifunctional Administrative City at the office of the Multifunctional Administrative City Construction Project Center located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, 142-1, to the person in charge of the administrative city construction project at the office of the Multifunctional Administrative City Construction Project Center located in J.

However, since a person engaged in the livestock industry in the above land was the defendant, the defendant A received compensation for the closure of the livestock industry in the name of 53 mari, 1 mari, low temperature storage, and one livestock industry. The defendant A received compensation for the closure of the livestock industry in the name of 26 mari, 1 mari, low temperature storage, and 27 mari and 27 mari under the name of the defendant B, and the compensation for the closure of the livestock industry in the name of a person who is not engaged in the livestock industry.

As above, the Defendants conspired to deception the above J and deceiving it from the victim of the Republic of Korea as compensation for the livestock industry around December 21, 2006.