1. The Defendant: 68,764,60 won to Plaintiff A; 4,946,800 won to Plaintiff B; 15,481,200 won to Plaintiff C; and 26,69.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Approval and public notice of a project - Name of an urban development project of an E district - Public notice of an urban development project of an E district: F, etc. public notice of Chungcheongbuk-do on August 12, 2011 - The defendant

(b) Decision on expropriation by the Chungcheongbuk-do Regional Land Tribunal on August 20, 2013 - The date of commencement of expropriation: October 19, 2013 - The objects of expropriation and compensation for losses: as listed below:

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands” - - At the same time, the land category of the land subject to expropriation is 3,582 A 394,020,000 GH located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Do, 1990 G 2,056 190,180,180,000 before KK 698 64,565,000 5 L 70465,120,000 682,680,680,000 664 B,98,988,007 N2,37,384,209, 2039, 205, 305, 305, 2039, 205, 305, 207, 2004

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on January 23, 2014 - Compensation for losses: as listed below:

- ASEAN - The land category of the land to be expropriated is 3,582 A 397,602 A 397,602,000 GJ 2 I 990 70,280,280,000 before 3J 2,056 191,824,800 K 698 65,123,400 5 L 704,65,683,200 704 65,683,200 890,513,406 M 664 B 86,685, 2007 N 230,95, 800, 397 D 297, 2395, 305, 305, 307, 205, 307, 305, 207, 205, 237, 2537, 25

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The appraisal, which is the basis of the Plaintiff’s objection, is erroneous in the selection, etc. of comparative standard land, so it is illegal and unjust to rate the amount of compensation for each land of this case.