1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why the court shall explain this part of the ruling are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the third party "(s) of the judgment of the court of first instance" as follows. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

<표1> 수용대상 토지 수용재결금액(원) 이의재결금액(원) 법원감정금액(원) 소재지 지번 지목 면적(㎡) 공부 현황 하남시 E F 대 대 197 ×1/2 163,514,920 164,480,220 169,961,750 G 잡 잡 1,488 ×1/2 575,223,600 575,260,800 595,348,800 H 잡 잡 1,527 ×1/2 590,300,020 590,338,200 610,952,700 I 전 전 462 ×2132.5 /2798 464,121,470 464,262,320 480,489,300 전 869 ×2132.5 /2798 297,973,120 297,973,120 307,245,600 J 임 임 807 ×1/1 225,153,000 225,233,700 현황‘임야’ 전제 : 233,142,300 (㎡당 288,900) 현황‘잡종지’전제 : 653,427,900 (㎡당 809,700) 현황‘전’전제 : 378,321,600 (㎡당 468,800) 도 166 ×1/1 15,288,600 15,288,600 ‘임야’ ‘도로’전제 : 15,819,800 (㎡당 95,300) ‘잡종지’ ‘도로’전제 : 44,803,400 (㎡당 269,900) ‘전’ ‘도로’전제 : 25,912,600 (㎡ 156,100) K 대 대 191 ×1/1 329,971,600 330,009,800 340,705,800 L 임 임 112 ×1/2 73,281,600 73,306,800 75,661,600 임 2,798 ×1/2 404,590,800 404,590,800 418,860,600 도 396 ×1/2 18,909,000 18,909,000 19,542,600 총 계 3,158,327,730 3,159,653,360 3,018,768,750 J 토지 평가금액

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the same as that for the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the text of Article 420

나. 판단 ⑴ J 토지의 이용상황 및 평가방식 ㈎ 관련 법리 공익사업을 위한 토지 등의 취득 및 보상에 관한 법률 제70조 제2항, 제6항, 같은 법 시행규칙 제24조에 의하면 토지에 대한 보상액은 현실적인 이용상황에 따라...