The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of the legal principles (1) The defendant's practice constitutes a justifiable act that does not constitute medical practice and does not violate social rules.

Since Article 27 (1) of the Medical Service Act is unconstitutional, it cannot be punished on the ground that the above provision was violated.

(2) The phrase posted on the Defendant’s Internet homepage or physical correction center does not constitute medical advertising.

B. The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant asserted that there was a misapprehension of the legal doctrine, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s allegation on the ground of its reasoning.

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is justified, and the defendant's allegation of misapprehension of the legal principles is without merit.

B. In full view of the circumstances favorable to, or unfavorable to, the defendant who has detailedly expressed the judgment of the court below regarding the unfair argument of sentencing, and the fact that the court below seems to have taken the prior action in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the fact that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions in the trial, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

There is no reason to believe that the sentencing of the defendant is unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.