The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal 1) The misunderstanding of facts and legal principles mainly put the users with physical methods, such as the method of correction and scarcity, etc., and the Defendant complained of liver pains, and did not engage in any medical practice against the customers, which led them to a considerable impact on their body.

2) The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. 1) The Defendant made the same assertion in the lower court on the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine.

In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant’s act stated in the facts charged constituted medical practice.

① 의료인이 아닌 피고인은 사무실 건물 창문에 ‘ 골반관리, 일자 목, 측만 증, 안면 비대칭, 통증관리, 턱관절, 휜 다리, 체형 관리’ 의 문구를 기재하고, 네이버 블 로그에 카이로 프 랙 틱의 효능, 체형 교정 사례, 휜 다리 교정 사례, 골반 교정 사례, 거북목 교정 사례, 턱관절 교정 사례와 함께 골격사진, 엑스레이 사진을 이용하여 체형을 교정한다는 글을 게시하여 자신이 운영하는 체형 교정센터를 광고 하였다.

② 피고인은 ‘ 근골격계 통증, 카이로 프 랙 틱, 장기 교정, 체형 교정, 턱관절 교정, CST( 두 개천 골 요법), 안면 골 교정, 휜 다리 교정 (OX 다리), 카이로 프 랙 틱 전공’ 이라고 적혀 있는 명함을 소지한 채 영업을 하였다.

③ The Defendant placed in the office the inverte model and telegraph framework of the human body, complained of pains on the lue, neck, and shoulder part, asked the customers who found him to open the body and to increase the volume of the body, put up the body-type photographs, and diagnosed the imbalances of the pelvise, spine, etc. by reading them.

In order to correct this, the defendant is in the line.