Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months and a fine of one hundred thousand won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 29, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the application of the Gwangju District Court on 29 December 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 5, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, even though he had a history of driving under the influence of alcohol as above, the Defendant driven a DNA halog car in the direction of 0.103% of blood alcohol concentration at the section of about 5 km from the front of the apartment B apartment in Yong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul, to reach the front road of the C apartment at the Mapopo City.

As a result, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. The Defendant violating the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a DNA car.

On September 5, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.103% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10%, and led the front road of Mapopo-si to the F Burial and Culture Center.

At the time, since it was not good at the time, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle safely by safely driving the motor vehicle by viewing the front side and accurately manipulating the steering direction, brakes, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty of care required for driving under the influence of alcohol as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1) and neglected to perform his duty of care, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s negligence, following the left side of the Defendant’s car, and then hniff of the Victim G Driving’s Hniffus on the left side of the pent part

Ultimately, the Defendant did not provide personal information to the victim even though he damaged the victim’s car by the foregoing occupational negligence so that the repair cost is not available.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

1. With respect to the report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, the actual condition survey report, relevant photographs, and I road traffic accident;