logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고정1535
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

1. On February 22, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim, i.e., the victim D (n., the age of 63) living in the apartment in front of the G apartment building C heading, and the victim who wishes to board an elevator with his/her face and left arms, followed by the victim who was living in the apartment in front of the G apartment C heading, and who was living in the apartment in connection with the election of heading Tong, and who followed the victim who was able to board the elevator, caused him/her to be faced with the elevator knife with the elevator knife with his/her face and left arms, and the elevator knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the defendant and his defense counsel did not have any assaulting the victim, such as impairing the body of the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case, and assaulting the victim of domestic affairs.

It argues that the act constitutes a legitimate act.

2. The judgment is based on the following private matters, namely, ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the effect that “the defendant committed an assault, such as cutting in balth, sallling or pusheding, etc. inside the elevator”, ② According to CCTV images taken by the situation at the time, the defendant was able to take off the victim from an elevator with the victim’s breast part in an elevator, and the victim was faced with the victim’s body on the elevator rail. In full view of the following facts: (a) the victim’s body was sealed as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case and confirmed that the victim was faced with the victim on the elevator rail rail.

arrow