1. The defendant,

A. The phrase “paid amount” of the unpaid remuneration in the attached Table 1 attached hereto to the Plaintiffs is each money and each of the above.

1. The judgment on the cause of the claim is based on the following: (a) the Defendant was merged in operating Jeju Industrial Information University and Search University on March 1, 2012 and opened to Jeju International University on March 1, 2012; (b) the Plaintiffs were employees employed by the Defendant; and (c) the Plaintiffs were not paid part of the wages from the Defendant during the period from January 2, 2011 to May 2014 (Provided, That in the case of Plaintiff AB, from July 2, 2011 to May 2014), and the amount was as stated in the column for claim amount of unpaid remuneration in the attached Table 1; (d) Plaintiff 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 24, and 26 were not paid annual leave allowances on March 1, 2012; and (e) the Plaintiffs did not have any dispute between the parties’ presentation and the entire statement in the attached Table 2’s column for payment.

According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs the amount stated in the "amount claimed" column for the unpaid annual leave allowance in attached Form 1 and damages for delay on each of the above amounts, and to pay to the plaintiffs 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 24, and 26 the amount stated in the "amount claimed" column for the details of the annual leave allowance in attached Form 2 and damages for delay on each of the above amounts.

2. On the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant asserts that: (a) on January 2015, 2015, the Plaintiffs paid in lieu of the income tax on January 2, 2014 to December 12, 2015; and (b) deducted the unpaid amount from the unpaid remuneration; and (c) deducted the remaining amount from the unpaid amount as stated in the “paid amount” column

In full view of the following facts: (a) around January 2015, the Defendant paid the Plaintiffs a pro rata income tax on or around January 1 to December 12, 2014; and (b) the amount is recognized respectively as having the same facts as the entry in the “amount of unpaid remuneration” column, and thus, the Defendant’s “amount of claim” column of unpaid remuneration as stated in the separate sheet is included in the amount of unpaid remuneration.