1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 2,400,000 and KRW 1,000,000 among them, from May 7, 2011.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 4 (including additional numbers), the plaintiff entered into a credit transaction agreement with the defendant corporation on July 29, 2008, which provides that the defendant corporation will bear up to 4 billion won by July 29, 2012, interest shall be at the rate fixed by the plaintiff at the time of bill discount, and where the payment of principal and interest is delayed, interest shall be at the rate of 24% per annum (hereinafter "credit transaction agreement of this case"). The defendant Eul and C shall be at the rate of 1.5 billion won per annum, and the plaintiff shall be at the rate of 1.5 billion won per annum, 1.5 billion won per annum, 2.5 billion won per annum, and 1.5 billion won per annum, 2.5 billion won per annum, and 1.5 billion won per annum, 2.5 billion won per annum, 2.15 billion won per annum, with the above loan of the defendant corporation.

2. As to the judgment on the defendant B's defense, the defendant B asserts that he resigned from the representative director of the defendant company on February 17, 2009, the scope of the above defendant's liability should be limited to the debts incurred during his service, and that he is not liable for each of the above loans that occurred after his resignation.

If directors, etc. of a company stand joint and several sureties for debt incurred by continuous transactions with a third party of a company, it is inevitable to assume only the debt incurred during the company's transaction to directors, etc. because they are the status of directors.