logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고단1497
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The name influor is a person who operates a telephone financial fraud organization that receives money from victims under the pretext of a deposit money, repayment of loans, etc. necessary for loans by misrepresenting an unspecified number of victims to make a loan and to open a masp passbook by misrepresenting an unspecified number of victims, etc. In addition, another name influor (hereinafter “F”) is a person who manages the steering staff who withdraws the money deposited in the account after inviting an account to use it for the crime of Bosphishing fraud, and delivers the physical card, etc. used for the crime to other lighting staff and instructs the withdrawal and re-transfer of cash, etc., and the defendant is a person who takes the role of withdrawing money in accordance with the above F’s direction.

On July 2017, the Defendant received a physical card and password connected to the K Bank Account in the name of AM from the H office located in G in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si by using the above F’s home line.

Since then, an employee in charge of false telephone financing fraud will make a credit loan when remitting a guarantee insurance premium to the victim AO on July 21, 2017.

“Falsely speaking, the victim received KRW 314,00 from the victim to the account in the name of the said AMF as a deposit money necessary for lending, and from July 19, 2017 to July 21, 2017, by deceiving the victims on a total of seven occasions, such as the foregoing method in the attached crime list, etc., and then deceiving the victims on a total of seven occasions from July 19, 2017, and was remitted total of KRW 8,218,000 from the victims. The Defendant, during the same period, withdrawn the remitted victims’ money and remitted it to the account instructed by the said FF.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving victims in collusion with his or her nameless telephone financial fraud assistance staff.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of the police against AM;

1. Each police officer for AO, AP, Q, AR, AS, and AT.

arrow