logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.02.06 2013가단4894
물품대금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur who is engaged in the processing and manufacturing business of the ice leasing materials, etc. in the trade name of the Plaintiff in the inn city from the inn city, and the Defendant is a company that has its head office in the net city D, and is engaged in the steel structure manufacturing business. 2) The E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) established its head office in the above D, and is a company that engages in the manufacturing business of ship equipment, etc., and ordered the manufacturing of intermediate parts to the Defendant in the process of manufacturing final products using the materials such as the ice Lease, etc. around 2011.

B. The Plaintiff’s transfer of materials 1) From October 11, 201 to December 13, 2011, the Plaintiff’s purchase order note 22 from October 11, 201 to December 13, 201 is called the instant order note.

(2) The Plaintiff delivered the instant order to the right upper part of the instant order, stating the trade name, location of the headquarters, telephone number, and facsimile number, and other contact numbers of the Nonparty Company, and the terms and conditions of payment include “regular approval” in the item of the order, “regular D plant” in the part of the delivery place, and “F” in the part of the order number. The supplier’s name, telephone number, and facsimile number are indicated. (2) From October 11, 201 to December 13, 2011, the Plaintiff delivered the materials worth KRW 65,351,000 (hereinafter “the materials of this case”) in total twice in accordance with the instant order form.

【Reasons for Recognition】 Each description of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness G’s testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties’ assertion and the Plaintiff asserts that since the other party to the material supply contract concluded by delivering the instant order and delivering the instant materials (hereinafter “instant contract”) is the Defendant, the said party should receive KRW 65,351,000 for the said material price and delay damages therefrom from the Defendant.

The defendant did not conclude the contract of this case with the plaintiff, and the non-party company did not conclude the contract of this case.

arrow