logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2017.04.27 2017고정3
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2016, the Defendant 21:20 on November 30, 2016, 2016, the Defendant called 200,000 won on the ground that the Defendant: (a) the cab under the victim D (64 tax) operated around the 200,000 won on the ground that the cab under the victim D (64 Doo) was in a car with the Guto change the amount of KRW 200,00 from the damaged party’s expenses for rent and business losses.

The term “the victim” refers to the victim’s breath and breath, and assaulted the victim’s hair and flap with head by cutting the victim’s breath, making the victim’s bat and flap with drinking, cutting the victim’s bat and flap with the victim’s bat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police of D;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that although he/she was aware of the victim's dubage, the victim's chests and dubages were taken in drinking, there was no fact that he/she had the victim's chests and dubs together with the victim's hairs and dubs, and had the head attached to the building.

However, in light of the following: (a) a witness E who testified in line with the victim’s specific and consistent statement, the background and circumstances of the occurrence of the case, and the Defendant’s statement is not the father of the Defendant, but the entire case was presented; (b) a witness E, who testified in line with the victim’s statement, does not appear to have been witnessed; (c) a witness E, as his father, does not appear to have been in the scene immediately after the occurrence of the case, makes it difficult to believe the victim’s statement as it is, such as making a statement difficult for the victim to have frightly obtain smartphones with the victim’s fatch with the victim’s fat and fat; and (d) a witness, who makes it difficult for the victim to take advantage of his fat and fat; and (e) the Defendant made a statement

Defendant

And his defense counsel's above assertion is rejected.)

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow