The defendant's High Court's High Court Decision 2015 Ghana2486 decided December 22, 2015 is based on the defendant's High Court's High Court's Decision on the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for a payment order against the Plaintiffs for a loan claim with the Goyang District Court 2015Guj1876, and the Defendant lent KRW 40,000 to the Plaintiff on July 20, 2009, and the Plaintiff A jointly guaranteed the Plaintiff’s loan obligation, and the Plaintiff asserted that the loan obligation remains at KRW 4,859,400 as of December 13, 201.2) The Plaintiffs were served the original copy of the payment order from the above court on June 16, 2015, and on June 22, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the payment order as of June 22, 2015, and the said lawsuit was performed as the litigation procedure.

(3) The court rendered a judgment on December 22, 2015 that "the plaintiff jointly pays to the defendant 9,069,104 won and 4,859,400 won with 15% interest per annum from June 17, 2015 to the day of full payment," and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time (hereinafter referred to as "the judgment of this case"). The court rendered a judgment on December 22, 2015 that "the plaintiff jointly pays to the defendant 9,069,104 won and 4,859,400 won per annum from June 17, 2015 to the day of full payment").

(B) B. Plaintiff A filed an application for immunity from bankruptcy and immunity with Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014Hadan5751, 2014Ma5751, 5751, and Plaintiff B filed an application for immunity from each of the bankruptcy and immunity from the above courts (hereinafter “each of the immunity from immunity from each of the instant cases”) on January 12, 2015.

) The decision to grant immunity to Plaintiff A was made on January 1, 2015, and the decision to grant immunity to Plaintiff B became final and conclusive on January 29, 2015, respectively. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 10, and 11, and the purport of the entire pleadings, respectively.

2. Determination

A. On January 201, 2010, the gist of the 1st Plaintiffs’ claim as to the cause of the claim is that the Plaintiffs repaid all the obligations of the borrowed money.