The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 16, 2013, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that F, the husband of the Defendant, among Non-Indicted c, D, and the Defendant’s father, is in an internal relationship with the victim G at the Daegu Suwon-gu dong department store store, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that the Defendant’s husband, among Non-Indicted c, D, and the Defendant’s father’s father, is in an internal relationship with the victim G. The Defendant’s payment of benefits does not vary from the fact that the amount exceeds 2-3 times the other people. The Defendant paid the amount of benefits to G’s husband at the above F’s hospital, and the victim H, the wife of G, also received KRW 2 million each month at the above hospital. When considering that the Defendant’s h, the Defendant’s horse, also received two million won each month, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that F is certain, G, and H, which is its horse, is not a human being, and is completely low.”

However, the Defendant’s husband, F and the Victim G did not have any relationship with the Defendant’s husband, and the money that the said F paid to the said G was remitted to the Defendant for the purchase of real estate under the name of the said G, and the money that the said F F paid to the said G E was paid by the said F to the Defendant for the use of the vehicle in the name of the said G’s husband for the transport of the patient at the hospital. The money that the F paid to the victim H was repaid to the said F when the said H worked as the restaurant restaurant of the above F’s hospital.

Nevertheless, the defendant has harmed the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts as above.

2. Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, such as the crime of failing to make a judgment, the victim's penalty, and the victim's penalty.