The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. There is an error of mistake of facts in the judgment of the court of original judgment which judged otherwise, although the defendant did not have insult as stated in the facts charged, such as insult.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to whether a victim E had an insulting speech or behavior, ① a letter has been published to the effect that he slandered the Defendant’s incidentalF on the Internet site, which is the Internet site even though the victim E wanted to have retired from the post, and that he did not have any objection to the Defendant’s continuous distribution, and ② the Defendant, the F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’.