The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is in favor of the defendant, such as the confession of the crime of this case and the fact that the amount of penphones handled by the defendant is relatively large, economic situation, most of his family members to support the crime of this case. However, the crime of this case is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate narcotics crimes in light of the addiction of narcotics and harmful effects caused by administration of narcotics as the case where the defendant delivered part of a rophonephonephones received from a single upper line for several times, and issued them for several times, etc. In particular, the crime of delivery of narcotics in this case requires a more strict punishment by spreading narcotics to others by placing them into addiction to narcotics, and the defendant was detained for the same crime of this case in 205 and was subject to conditional suspension of indictment, and the defendant has already been sentenced to punishment for the crime of this case (the defendant's punishment of this case by 1 to 2 years after being detained, the defendant's recommendation to give and receive the basic sentencing guidelines for the crime of this case from 1 to 2 years after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor.