The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is favorable to the fact that he made a confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case, the defendant made a statement to the drug supplier (one life line) at the time when he was investigated by an investigative agency and actively cooperates in the investigation of narcotics, etc. However, the crime of this case is found to have been exposed to eight times as well as to have repeatedly administered phiphones purchased by the defendant and carried the remaining phiphones on eight occasions by means of directly administering them, etc. In light of the addiction to narcotics and harm caused by medication, etc., the crime of this case is deemed to require strict punishment. In particular, the crime of providing narcotics among the above crimes is deemed to have spread of narcotics by placing others into the addiction to narcotics, and more severe punishment is required; the defendant is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime of this case (including six times) and to have been subject to punishment for the same kind of crime of this case; the defendant appears to have been subject to punishment for several times during the period of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime of this case; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for two months or more.