1. The part concerning the conjunctive claim in the first instance judgment is revoked, and the plaintiff's conjunctive claim is dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of processing agricultural and livestock products meat products, wholesale and retail business of agricultural and livestock products, and sales and distribution business of agricultural and livestock products. The Defendant is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and processing agricultural, fishery and livestock products, wholesale and retail business, and sales business of agricultural, fishery and livestock products.

B. The Plaintiff’s representative director I was introduced with K and L through the J, which is operating a livestock industry distribution business around April and May 2013.

K is a person in charge of livestock distribution in the defendant company, and L is a person engaged in livestock distribution business.

At the time, I sought a new business other than the previous business of selling and distributing pigs, but K and L stated that if K and L operate a business by shipping Chinese rain to I, compared to other slaughterhouses, they would make a profit to KRW 1,000 to KRW 2,000,000.

As a result, I agreed with K that the Plaintiff, who received funds from the Defendant, shall purchase Korea-do rain from the Defendant, and then sell Korea-do rain purchased from the Defendant-do farmer to the Chungcheongnam-do Sound Co., Ltd. through a cooperative organization such as the Agricultural Cooperative or the Agricultural Cooperative Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “BF”), and that the Plaintiff, who received funds from the Defendant, shall carry out the business in a way of selling Korea-do milk through a cooperative organization such as the Agricultural Cooperative or the Agricultural Cooperative Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “BF”), shall be able to use the part of the concentration borrowed from the name of the Central Cooperative only in the name of the Central Cooperative, so that I and J can use it through B Livestock Cooperatives (hereinafter “BF”).

C. Since then, K and J together with the M factory head under Batul, I sought N to explain the land listing project and request Batul to lend the name of Batul in order to have the system shipment type instead of paying a certain amount of fees.

Pursuant to the N’s above request, the Plaintiff borrowed the name of the Livestock Cooperative on June 25, 2013 to purchase and settle rain, processed meat and settlement between the Defendant.