beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B is the business owner running “G Gameland” on the first floor of the F DF conference located in Sinju City. H is the head of the management department in charge of money exchange while managing employees in the above game site, and I is the so-called head of the management department in charge of money exchange and the head of the management department in charge of the above game site, as agreed to receive monthly salary of 3 million won on the condition of punishment instead of punishment when regulating, and J and K are the employees of the above game site.
In spite of the fact that anyone was prohibited from providing a game product that has not been rated for distribution or use, or displaying or keeping it for that purpose, the Defendant, in collusion with D, H, I, J, and K, installed 40 units of “phishing” and 20 units of “scamboo” which were not rated at the above game site from August 1, 2012 to July of the same month, and provided a large number of unspecified customers for use.
B. In spite of the fact that a person does not engage in an act of exchanging, arranging exchange, or re-purchasing the results obtained through the use of a game product, the Defendant, in collusion with D, H, I, J, and K, was engaged in business of raising 10% of the fee per page and exchanging 4,500 won in cash in collusion with the date and time, time, and place specified in the above paragraph (a).
2. Defendant A is a regional line operated by “G Gameland,” and Defendant B is a vocational line operated by “G Gameland.”
B, from August 1, 2012 to August 7, 2012, B was subject to the police control on suspicion that the operation of the said game room from August 1, 2012, and the use and exchange of a game machine that was not rated around August 7, 2012.
The Defendant was aware of the fact that the crime as above was committed by the Defendant, but was committed on June 10, 2013, the Prosecutor’s Office 306 of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Security (No. 85-4), which held that the Defendant was present at the inspection room of the public Prosecutor’s Office of Security (No. 306), and “in this country, he was unemployed in G Gameland and operated the game room by