logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정2058
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

(2) The Defendant of the crime history: “The main offenderD of the suspicion of bribery amounting to 169 billion won which is arrested to remove the risk of destruction of evidence by arresting him/her, i.e., the head offender who arrested and arrest him/her to arrest him/her, and the risk of destruction of evidence,” and “the Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok

The highest person responsible for handling shall be accused of occupational breach of trust.

The phrase "" was written.

In addition, around September 11, 2014, the Defendant posted a letter, “I would like to see in its real name, even though I would not do so, I would like to treat I would like to write I would like to write I would like to write I would like to say I would like to say I would like to say I would like to see I would like to say I would like to “I would like to immediately investigate D who changed I would like to accept I would like to immediately investigate I would like to go I would like to.”

As such, the Defendant, from August 28, 2014 to September 11, 2014, revealed publicly false facts through an information and communications network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and D;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of the police statement law to H

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a provisional payment order shall be issued.

arrow