The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the defendant who has no certain occupation, and the defendant is the defendant at the bottom of the article of the Special Act on the Gaogle E (Law No. 1000, F) of the Gaogle News bulletin board around August 19, 2017, and the same year.

8. 22:06 around 19.22:06, the Defendant’s office located in C of the Jung-gu Seoul Central Government of the Republic of Korea “I” to “I” means the Defendant’s office in the Seoul Central Government of the Republic of Korea.

The aging and age of the elderly in all the paths that have been well developed, and all the paths have to become older and older, and the aging and age of the elderly have not been raised, “The content of “,” and a false writing was drawn up and published as the wife and consciousness of the victim who was a fluent var, was hidden.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts for the purpose of slandering.

2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act.

On July 2, 2018, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victim E expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant.

3. According to the conclusion, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.